PROG rock, an elongated style of rock music once thought to have been banished by the simpler pleasures of punk and dance, is making a triumphant return to chart success.
One of the stalwart artists of the genre, Scottish flautist Ian Anderson, 66, looks set to enjoy his biggest hit for more than four decades.
Like many prog rock albums, Anderson's latest work is on a theme or concept — in this case the album, Homo Erraticus, delves musically into key events of British history.
These musical essays have proved popular enough to vault it into the top ten albums, according to the Official Charts Company's midweek update.
The album, which is presented in three sections, is currently standing at number six in the charts.
The record revives characters from his band, Jethro Tull, most famous album, 1972's Thick As A Brick and also muses on "Doggerland" the area that used to connect the British Isles with mainland Europe.
The Fife-born musician, who is reported to be worth £35 million, said: "If it is number six today, it will be 36 next week, then 1,006, but it's nice to be recognised in any context."
Prog rock flourished in the 1970s, when bands such as Yes, Pink Floyd and Genesis released long albums replete with multiple time-signatures, complex story lines and over-arching lyrical and musical concepts.
Its complex style and arcane lyrics were deemed to have been rendered obsolete when punk and disco became successful in the late 1970s, although modern bands such as Radiohead and Muse have dabbled in similar territories.
Anderson added: "Concept albums went out of fashion in the mid-1970s but progressive music is gathering strength again.
"Prog's bombastic, self-indulgent musical noodlings got a lot of people annoyed.
"It took punk to wash the system clean and make a fresh start."
He said the concept for the album was "migration" and added: "All of us are from somewhere else. But it's not a stern lecture."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article