PEERS have thrown out the Coalition Government's plans to allow terror suspects to be stripped of their British citizenship even if left stateless.
The cross-party amendment to the Immigration Bill was backed by 242 votes to 180, majority 62, as peers hit out at a policy "used by tyrants and dictators".
The defeat was the second of a bruising day for ministers in the Lords after peers earlier pushed for the appointment of guardians to help children who had been trafficked.
Under the government's plans, Home Secretary Theresa May would have been able to remove the citizenship of a naturalised Briton who had acted in a way "seriously prejudicial to the vital interests" of the country. At present citizenship can only be removed if the person will not be left stateless.
Lord Pannick, a leading QC and independent crossbencher, put forward the successful amendment, which will remove the provision from the Bill and instead set up a joint committee of MPs and peers to decide whether such powers are necessary. He said: "There are regrettably all too many dictators around the world willing to use the creation of statelessness as a weapon against opponents."
Labour peer Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws, a leading QC, described leaving someone stateless as "repugnant".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article