A HOSPITAL missed repeated chances to save the life of an eight-months pregnant woman because she was never seen by a senior baby specialist.
A Sheriff has criticised the sub standard care given to mother-to-be Caroline McCall before her death at one of Scotland's leading maternity units.
Ms McCall, a 38-year-old social worker from Cambuslang in South Lanarkshire, was given the heartburn remedy Gaviscon when she was admitted to Princess Royal Maternity Hospital in Glasgow with what she believed to be a heart attack.
She died clutching her chest in pain almost two days later of severe heart trauma, having never been seen by a consultant obstetrician. Her premature baby was safely delivered by Caesarian Section almost 20 minutes after she finally collapsed.
Following a Fatal Accident Inquiry at Glasgow Sheriff Court last summer, Sheriff Daniel Scullion has now ruled her death might have been avoided if she had been seen by a consultant in obstetrics.
He said there were four opportunities to carry this out, when she was first admitted to the Princess Royal Maternity Hospital on the morning of November 24 2008; during the morning ward round or later that day; or when she was rushed to the hospital's high dependency unit on November 25.
She may have lived if she had been seen by a senior physician or if heart problems had been considered.
Sheriff Scullion also highlighted a defect in the hospital's systems, which did not ensure an outstanding request for a review of an obstetric patient was highlighted as part of shift handover.
He said: "Caroline was admitted to a major maternity hospital because she was unwell.
"She died some 41 hours later, without a consultant obstetrician having seen her and without a consultant having been involved in any aspect of her treatment before the fatal collapse that immediately preceded her death.
"Indeed, no evidence was led to suggest that prior to that collapse at 6.30am on November 26 2008, any consultant was aware that she was an inpatient.
"The lack of consultant obstetrician involvement clearly amounted to substandard care."
The rare condition which killed Ms McCall, Aortic Dissection, a rupturing of the heart, went undetected by medics and was only discovered during the post mortem examination. Cases of Aortic Dissection have actually increased in expectant mothers in the five years since Ms McCall's death.
Sheriff Scullion added: "Something needs to be done to improve the rate of detection of Aortic Dissection in expectant mothers.
"If it has not already done so, Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board should initiate discussion with the appropriate medical authorities, designed to ensure that the issue of improving the detection in expectant mothers of the life-threatening condition receives appropriate attention."
The FAI report was welcomed by Alan Muir, 46, Ms McCall's partner and father of her five-year-old daughter, Grace.
He said: "The family's position has always been that Caroline was not given a chance.
"That view has been borne out in the Sheriff's report."
Mr Muir is suing the health board and said the family now want it to accept responsibility for her death and dispense with the need for more upsetting days of evidence in court.
A spokesman for the health board said: "NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde would like to reiterate its deepest condolences to this patient's family for their loss.
"We have only just received the Sheriff's determination. We will examine the determination in detail including any recommendations."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article