A LEADING Ukip member has stood down as his party's economic spokesman after he was branded a hypocrite for striking wind-farm deals on his Scottish estates.
Professor Tim Congdon agreed the contracts with SSE in Argyll and E.On Renewables in Caithness, the Sunday Herald revealed last month.
But Mr Congdon was accused of hypocrisy over the arrangements, which appeared to fly in the face of Ukip's anti-wind farm stance.
The party claims the developments are economically "unsustainable" and eyesores that blight the countryside.
Last night it emerged that Mr Congdon had stood down as economics spokesman following the row. But it is thought he wants to remain as the party's candidate in the Forest of Dean where he is due to stand in the 2015 General Election.
His resignation will place further pressure on Ukip.
The party has come under scrutiny in recent months, as the party gears up for the European Parliament elections.
Ukip is expected to do well in the UK-wide poll, potentially even beating the Conservatives.
Last month Mr Congdon admitted his actions regarding wind farms had been "maybe hypocritical".
He struck a deal with SSE to allow them access to a track through three forests that he owns in Kintyre in order to build a 10-turbine wind farm at Cour.
When asked he refused to disclose how much he receieved.
In 2010, Mr Congdon signed another agreement, this time with E.On Climate & Renewables UK Developments Ltd, for a wind farm at his Hollandmey Forest in Caithness.
He was entitled to early test and lease payments, although E.On chose not to proceed with the site in the end.
The terms included a £10,000 "option fee" and £25,000 "Hollandmey Farmhouse Compensation".
A Ukip spokesman said: "Professor Congdon stepped down over a week ago, and we agreed to his resignation. Discussions are still going on about what to do in the Forest of Dean."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article