Banks estimated the value of Royal Mail at up to £8.6 billion when approached months ahead of the eventual sale for £3.3 billion.
Business Minister Michael Fallon revealed the higher and lower estimates of 21 different banks, on an anonymous basis, in answers to written Parliamentary questions.
One bank estimated the value could be as low as £2.8 billion.
Mr Fallon cautioned the figures had only ever been estimates based on information in the public domain.
He said: "As the banks who appeared at the select committee on business, innovation and skills on November 20, 2013, stressed in their evidence, their valuations were primarily desk top valuations based on limited publicly available information and widely varying assumptions.
"These were, therefore, very much illustrative valuations which the banks produced several months before the IPO (initial public offering) was implemented against a completely different backdrop.
"They therefore did not accurately reflect the specific circumstances and market that prevailed immediately prior to the IPO when pricing decisions were being taken."
On average, the banks estimated a lower value of £3.9 billion and an upper value of £4.8 billion.
In his answers, to Labour MP Jim Cunningham (Coventry South), Mr Fallon said consultants Lazard were paid a fee of £1.5 million for advising on the IPO.
Ministers have faced repeated claims they under valued Royal Mail when they sold off 60% of the company last year only to see the share price soar.
Royal Mail shares opened today at 604.5p. They were initially sold at 330p.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article