DIRTY beds remain among the biggest dangers of infection to patients, according to the latest report from health inspectors.
The report said that, while there had been a general improvement in hospital cleanliness, progress is undermined by basic failings in relation to patient equipment.
This relates to beds, mattresses and commodes - as well as management of needles, waste and linen and continuing concerns around hand-cleaning by NHS staff.
The latest report by the Healthcare Environment Inspectorate (HEI) said wards were cleaner, staff knew about their role in infection control, and inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics had been curbed.
In the four years since the HEI was established there has been a strong decline in both serious breaches and more general criticism, against a backdrop of an increasingly tough regime in which inspections have become unannounced.
Susan Brimelow, chief inspector of HEI, said: "Overall, the public should be assured by our findings which show that NHS Scotland continues to make good progress in raising standards of hospital cleanliness, hygiene and infection control.
"NHS boards are clearly taking our inspections seriously and when we do raise concerns with NHS boards we see from their action plans and our own follow-up inspections that this results in clear action to raise standards.
"However, it is vital that improvements are not just made as a short-term action following our inspections - they need to be sustained over time."
She said that, in spite of the general improvement, it was particularly disappointing to find recurring areas where improvement was needed.
She said: "For example, too often inspectors find that patient equipment is not clean. Good examples exist in other healthcare systems where dedicated patient equipment teams and equipment stores ensure patient equipment is clean and ready for use.
"We will continue to work with every NHS board to continue to raise the bar and ensure that, together, we provide a safe and clean environment for patients at all times, and the awareness of snap inspections."
The facts and figures of the inspectorate's four years in operation suggest broad improvement, with serious issues raised being 172 in year one and 210 in year two, but falling dramatically to 110 in year three. The most recent year, 2012-13, saw a further fall to 104 but with more unannounced inspections, which it was felt made the overall picture more encouraging.
Stated highlights in the report were:
l Hospitals inspected by HEI were generally clean and well maintained.
l NHS staff were clear on their roles and responsibilities in relation to infection prevention and control.
l Good compliance in relation to the prescribing of antibiotics.
Ms Brimelow said improvements were welcome but that there was no need for some of the adverse findings, such as poor cleanliness of bedframes and mattresses. However, she denied the problems were caused by restrictions on NHS budgets.
She said: "I don't think this is anything to do with funding. These are basic standards which I think patients should expect.
"This isn't hard to deal with and every patient should expect a clean bed when they arrive in hospital. That is why we need to look nationally at other systems."
Health Secretary Alex Neil said: "NHS Scotland has a robust scrutiny regime in place and I am confident that this system is continuing to drive improvement. It is encouraging that we are continuing to make good progress in raising standards of cleanliness in hospitals.
"However, I share the Inspectorate's disappointment that there are recurring areas where improvement is still required."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article