AN ex-fire service boss has lost his age discrimination case against his former employer.
David Dalziel, 62, claimed he missed out on leading Scotland's new national fire and rescue service because of his age.
The veteran fireman, who was with Grampian Fire and Rescue Service, decided to sue the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service after he lost out on senior positions when the eight regional services merged on April 1 last year. He took his former employer to an employment tribunal over claims of age discrimination and unfair dismissal at the end of last year.
Yesterday, it emerged that he had lost his case. He now has 42 days to appeal the tribunal decision.
A spokesman for Scottish Fire and Rescue Service said: "We acknowledge the decision of the tribunal and are very pleased the employment tribunal accepted the case put forward by SFRS."
Mr Dalziel claimed to have missed out on leading the national service despite being recommended for the job and claimed to have lost five senior management team positions to younger colleagues with less experience. However, the tribunal judges ruled that Mr Dalziel was not selected because of how he scored in an online psychometric test and how he dealt with interview questions. Three other candidates scored better during the interview process. Their ruling said that his treatment was "nothing whatsoever" to do with his age.
They also dismissed the complaint of unfair dismissal, ruling that no breach of duty and trust had been established.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article