BRUSSELS and Westminster have become embroiled in a war of words over claims the UK Government has stoked up fears over immigration for political purposes.
Labour also upped its rhetoric, suggesting it now wanted treaty changes to curb the free movement of people chasing jobs.
Viviane Reding, Vice President of the European Commission, accused David Cameron of peddling "populist myths" about EU migration, saying it was "simply not true" that there was an "invasion of foreigners", who were stealing jobs and draining welfare and health resources.
Ms Reding said: "I am mostly frustrated about the political leaders because what is leadership if you just try with populistic movements and populistic speech to gain votes? You are destroying the future of your people."
Her comments came after Donald Tusk, the Polish premier, protested about Mr Cameron's wanting to change a system under which EU migrants can claim UK child benefit for offspring living in their home country.
He also angered Laszlo Andor, the European employment commissioner, who warned Britain risked being seen as "nasty".
Tory backbencher Mark Reckless hit back, claiming the measures taken by the Coalition had been quite moderate. "It's these European politicians who seem to have been stoking this thing up," he declared.
He added: "People in this country get social security benefit but they spend it here. But very often people coming from Poland - and perhaps now from Romania and Bulgaria - are sending money home. It's quite wrong that if a child is being schooled in Poland and with family there that they should be paid child benefit by the taxpayers of this country."
Meantime, Chuka Umunna, the Shadow Business Secretary, strengthened Labour's position on migration, saying a Miliband government could seek new restrictions on the movement of people within the European Union.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article