A MAN who served nine years in jail for the murder of a taxi driver, despite evidence of another man claiming to be the killer, is believed to have taken his own life.
John McLay, 38, who was convicted of stabbing to death 27-year-old Stephen McDermott, was found dead at his home on January 3 . It is understood he died on New Year's Day.
Police said the incident was not being treated as suspicious.
McLay's death has devastated supporters who have promised to continue fighting to clear his name. He had recently told supporters he had "felt let down by the (legal) system".
The Glasgow-based Miscarriages of Justice Organisation (MOJO), which has been supporting his efforts to clear his name, described his death as a "scandal."
McLay shocked other users of the social networking site Twitter with comments shortly before his death at home in Airdrie, North Lanarkshire. His last words were: "The End."
He was 17 when he was sentenced to life for killing Mr McDermott outside his home in Glasgow in February 1992.
Twenty-one years later he said he was determined to prove he was the victim of a miscarriage of justice. Seven affidavits at the centre of his case, including one from a prison officer, said his co-accused Stephen Harkins had bragged about being the real murderer before his death.
McLay, who has a 22-year-old son, had previously admitted he had tried to kill himself three times as a result of "the torment of what happened". He said last year: "I will fight my case until my dying breath and will leave no stone unturned. I am prepared to take a lie detector test if necessary."
MOJO told supporters in a message: "It is with great sadness that we are informing you all that John McLay McIntosh ... unfortunately he felt let down by the system."
Co-project manager Paul McLaughlin said: "I was very close to John and it is a disgrace that anyone should have been in John's position. All the evidence shows he is an innocent man. It's soul-destroying. All he needed was someone in authority to listen to him.
"The danger was always whether John could cope with continuing. We knew how fragile he was. He had so much going on in his head and it was destroying him."
McLay and his co-accused blamed each other for the murder, with both said to have been "full of jellies" - a reference to the drug temazepam - at the time.
The trial judge, Lord Prosser, told the jury that there appeared to be substantial evidence against Harkins, who had already used his knife on another man that night.
Only one person had stabbed Mr McDermott. But there was also blood on a distinctive jacket said to have been worn by McLay.
The jury found the murder charge against Harkins - then 22 - not proven, while McLay was found guilty. Subsequent sworn statements that Harkins had admitted sole responsibility for the murder before and after the trial were deemed "hearsay evidence".
McLay was not allowed to use them in an appeal that subsequently failed.
However, in December 1997, then Scottish Secretary Donald Dewar referred the case to the Court Of Appeal in a landmark ruling that resulted in the statements being considered.
That evidence included a statement from prison officer William Blake who said Harkins told him McLay was serving life for a murder he had not committed.
But it did not occur to him to tell senior officers immediately and he refused to give an affidavit at first as he feared harm would come to him.
He eventually made a statement after Harkins died in January 1999.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article