THE Scottish Government has come in for increasing criticism over a £300,000 golden pay-off to the former chief executive of Historic Scotland, who quit after a turbulent 30 months in charge.
Ruth Parsons's tenure at the heritage agency included allegations from staff of bullying. Seven months after she left it was calculated she had accrued pension scheme benefits making her eligible for about £35,000 a year plus a £105,000 lump sum on retirement.
Ministers have now been urged to come clean over how approval was given for her severance package, which amounted to nearly three times her annual salary.
The 51-year-old was appointed to head the agency in 2009 but her time in charge was tainted by staff allegations of bullying. She had been a civil servant with the UK and Scottish governments for 30 years by the time she left.
Historic Scotland said no formal complaints were lodged, but a series of senior staff decided to leave the organisation after she took over the helm.
MSPs were shocked by the development and said the Scottish Government needed to be more transparent about the case.
Alex Johnstone, the Scottish Conservatives' spokesman on Infrastructure, Capital Investment, Housing and Transport, said ministers had to "come clean on who approved this and why".
He said: "Taxpayers will be rightly appalled by the excess of this golden goodbye payment.
"It's an insult to hard-working families everywhere for public money to be lavished on someone who, it appears, has chosen to leave of her own accord. How can the Scottish Government possibly justify giving someone a pay-off nearly three times her annual salary on top of a substantial pension package?"
Scottish Labour's Patricia Ferguson, the Shadow Cabinet Secretary for Culture, Sport and External Affairs, added: "The level of payout seems grossly excessive when considering the period of service at Historic Scotland and its dysfunctional nature during that period.
"This payment raises more questions about how Historic Scotland is managed. I have increasing concerns about how it is being run and given those concerns the decision of the SNP to give it even more responsibilities seems to go against best practice. Taxpayers will expect answers about how our money is being used."
Ms Parsons was appointed in 2009, and in October 2001 a staff survey revealed claims by staff that they faced harassment at work. The wellbeing study of Historic Scotland's 1100 staff at the time found 53 [5%] reported some form of bullying. Five said they were often victimised and two felt they were always bullied.
Ms Parsons, deputy director of the Strathclyde International Public Policy Institute at Strathclyde University, has always strongly denied allegations of discontent within the organisation, including "bullying" accusations levelled at her personally.
A Scottish Government spokesman said in a prepared statement: "Ministers do not approve individual severance packages. The approval is given to the Scottish Government to run a severance scheme to which people can apply. All applications are assessed against agreed criteria and Ms Parsons application for early exit was approved within the terms of this criteria."
Compensation is not normally payable "when someone resigns voluntarily outwith any existing (and approved) scheme" of compensation under government rules. Ministerial clearance must also be obtained.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article