Every woman in Scotland should welcome the commitment to a "transformative expansion" in childcare as indicated in the Scottish Government's White Paper on Independence.
This is the kind of commitment we have been seeking from our Scottish policy-makers since at least the devolution settlement.
Progress to date has been limited to incremental revision of existing provision. What is significant about the White Paper is the emphasis on a '"transformative" approach.
The current Scottish Government has already stated its desire to support more women into the formal labour market. A recognition of the role childcare plays in supporting the development of the Scottish economy appears to be what is driving the current agenda.
If that is the case, the plan laid out in the White Paper should be embraced as a signal that the role women play in influencing Scotland's economic performance is a central feature of the Scottish Government's approach to economic policy-making.
Any policy initiative that moves us closer towards a system of universal childcare provision is not just an innovation in social policy, but should be viewed as a crucial element in a strategy to promote sustainable economic growth.
In the short run, investment in supporting childcare serves as a stimulus to growth. The childcare sector is labour intensive, and so investment in this sector has a positive impact on employment.
In the medium term, there are benefits via a positive impact on female labour force participation, as mothers are more likely to participate when affordable, quality childcare is available.
The highest rates of employment of mothers are in Scandinavia, where public investment in childcare is high. If Scotland could replicate this, tens of thousands more women would be in work in Scotland.
A higher female employment rate increases economic growth and productivity and has a positive impact on fertility, making it more likely that population growth will be above replacement rate. It can also act in reducing the gender pay gap. Therefore, additional investment in childcare provision would more than pay for itself in the medium term.
In the long run, there is a return via the positive impact on children, on their education, health, behaviour and future earnings. This, in turn, means, other things being equal, a positive impact on participation in the labour market, economic growth and productivity, reductions in poverty and income inequality, greater cohesion and increase in healthy life expectancy.
And it will result in reductions in the kinds of expenditures incurred to provide services to socially excluded people who have not had a good start in life.
The gains of investment are greatest for the most deprived children. In addition to the educational gains, which in turn leads to gains in earnings, there are also behavioural gains, such as reduced likelihood of risky behaviours that are detrimental to health, and increased civic and social engagement. Of course, pre-school care and early education must be of high quality to obtain these desirable impacts.
The current political and economic environment in Scotland provides an opportunity to rethink how childcare is delivered and funded. If we accept the substantial economic and social benefits from the provision of good-quality childcare and view it as public investment rather than public expenditure, then there is a very strong economic case for providing comprehensive childcare free at the point of use.
Irrespective of the outcome of the September 2014 referendum, it is imperative that the gains made in recognising the role of women in Scotland's economy and the economic benefits of investing in childcare remain high on the political agenda.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article