A BID to deter people from keeping up the tradition of placing a traffic cone on an A-Listed monument in Glasgow city centre is to be withdrawn after a public outcry.
Glasgow City Council had drawn up plans to prevent the practice on the monument of the Duke of Wellington on horseback in Royal Exchange Square.
The local authority had been considering placing a plinth underneath the monument as part of a £65,000 refurbishment proposal, as it claimed the practice projects a "depressing" image of the city. It was hoped the move would have heightened the statue, placing it out of reach of people.
But last night it emerged that the local authority's leadership has been angered after details were made public. An online petition to save the cone on the Duke of Wellington attracted 4000 signatures. Organisers Donna Yates and Gavin Doig say it is a part of the city's heritage.
Discussions were taking place last night over how best to pull the application and draw a line under the debacle.
Although the council is in agreement that the duke's statue is being damaged and has quietly been removing the image from promotional materials, the language used in the application has been the source of the ire.
One source said: "Yes, we all agree that the tradition of the cone on the duke's head is probably one to move on from but it's not a 'depressing sight', as the application made out.
"It was probably felt this document was for internal consumption and wouldn't become public, but it has.
"Gordon [Matheson, the council leader] is as livid about this as I've ever seen him. He appreciates there's a lot of affection for this and the tone and language of the application hasn't helped.
"The issue now is how to move on from this and the first step will be to withdraw the application."
For years, the statue by the world-renowned Italian artist Baron Carlo Marochetti has been the target of revellers who climb the plinth to place a traffic cone on the monument, which is situated outside the city's Gallery of Modern Art.
But despite its own marketing agency using the image, its arms-length museums trust selling merchandise emblazoned with it and even the 2014 Commonwealth Games adopting it, the city council was seeking to stamp out this image of the city by doubling the size of the plinth so only the "most determined of vandals" would seek to continue the practice.
Historic Scotland, which has previously warned against the practice of placing a cone on the monument, was to pay £10,000 of the cost.
The raising of the statue was planned to be complete by 2015, the 200th anniversary of the defeat of Napoleon by Wellington at Waterloo.
It is also understood that fears of a major compensation claim against the council by someone falling from the plinth or being hit by a falling cone were partly behind the move.
According to Gary Nesbit, a leading expert on Glasgow's public statues, damage is being done to the duke by decades of being climbed upon.
But Mr Nesbit said he was opposed to any plinth, which he said would remove it from its scale and context.
He said: "His sword is damaged, the plinth is scuffed, it's covered with stickers and biological growth and how we treat a monument to a symbol of all that is wonderful about the British military is a disgrace. But raising it would destroy its scale. What's needed is illumination and cameras."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article