THE defeated SNP candidate at the Dunfermline by-election is not returning to her post with the Yes Scotland campaign, it can be revealed.
Shirley-Anne Somerville, who was director of communities at Yes Scotland, is instead taking up a new role with the SNP.
Her departure has fuelled concerns about the lack of women in key positions at the organisation.
As communities chief, Somerville - previously a Lothians MSP who lost her seat in 2011 - had the task of establishing a network of pro-independence activists. She was believed to have built a solid base and was respected by the different elements of the independence coalition.
While Somerville was absent, Yes Scotland brought in new faces to the communities team. One insider said the division had "changed", and the director's post no longer existed. This appears to confirm the view inside Yes Scotland that too many director-level posts were created in the early days.
However, concerns have also been expressed about the number of senior female employees leaving Yes Scotland. Of the four directors unveiled at the beginning of Yes Scotland, three were women - communications chief Susan Stewart, operations director Jacqueline Caldwell and Somerville. Now all three have gone.
One source said the departures did not bode well for Yes Scotland trying to bridge the gender gap in support for independence, with polls showing more men than women backing separation.
A source at Better Together, which campaigns for Scotland to remain part of the UK, said: "The SNP campaign is constantly telling us about this army of grass-roots activists they are building. It must be hard to build an army when the generals keep resigning."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article