VETERAN Tory Ken Clarke, 73, has announced that he will stand at the next General Election, while speculation is mounting that his Liberal Democrat contemporary, Sir Menzies Campbell, 72, will shortly announce he will not.
The former Chancellor, who is now Minister Without Portfolio, has been formally adopted as the Conservative candidate for Rushcliffe near Nottingham at the 2015 election after informing fellow Tories of his "continuing enthusiasm for life in Parliament".
The father-of-two, first elected in 1970 has held numerous frontbench roles.
He said: "There are lots of ambitious people who would like to be the next MP for Rushcliffe or the candidate for Rushcliffe and ask about my well-being and health. And there's been speculation in the press. It's bound to at my age.
"My wife Gillian is prepared for me to do it again. She probably thinks that having me hanging around the house complaining about the politics instead of participating wouldn't be a great improvement."
The popular, blokeish, pro-Europe MP added of his potential re-election: "I'll be 74 and in the mid-term of my career.
"I'm surprised to find myself still doing it.
"I'm a bit of a political anorak and I find politics are as fascinating as I ever did."
Meanwhile Sir Menzie, who led his party between 2006 and 2007, is believed to be seriously considering ending his career as the MP for North East Fife, which he began in 1987, at the next General Election.
Senior party sources have pointed out that, if he was re-elected, the veteran MP would be in his 80th year by 2020 and the next election.
Last night, he said he had been ruminating over the decision and had not yet made up his mind.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article