WOMEN should consider eating more fish during pregnancy as fears over mercury levels may be unfounded, scientists have said.
Mothers-to-be are currently warned to limit their fish intake due to the negative effects of mercury on foetal development.
But scientists say these guidelines may need to be reviewed following a study by the University of Bristol.
The research suggests fish accounts for just 7% of mercury levels in the human body, with all food and drink totalling less than 17%.
Surprisingly, it also found herbal teas and alcohol to be the foodstuffs associated with the highest mercury blood levels, after white and oily fish. Food including French fries, white bread and milk were found to have a protective effect.
Professor Jean Golding OBE, lead author of the report published in Environmental Health Perspectives, said eating fish had health benefits, adding:"We have previously found that eating fish during pregnancy has many health benefits for both mother and child. We hope many more women will now consider eating more fish during pregnancy."
The study involved 4484 women taking part in the Children of the 90s study.
Results showed that 38 of the women, less than 1%, had mercury levels higher than the maximum recommended by the US National Research Council. There is no official safe level in the UK. Women with the highest mercury tended to be older, have attended university, to be in a professional job, own their home and be expecting their first child.
Researchers found food and drink items accounted for less than 17% of total mercury levels in the body.
The levels were most associated with oily fish, white fish, herbal tea, alcohol, boiled rice, fresh fruit, sunflower or other oils used for frying and pasta. Other foods included fruit juice, health foods, brown or granary bread, pulses, shellfish, bran cereals and salad.
Negative predictors of mercury included white bread and French fries.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article