A NEW wildcat action plan, which is launched today, has been denounced as "a shameful effort" and "nine pages of PR fluff" that will not save the animal.
The Scottish wildcat is under threat from interbreeding - hybridisation -with feral and domestic cats.
The Scottish Wildcat Association (SWA) estimates there could be just 35 left in the wild.
The Scottish Government's initiative, to be led by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), aims to reverse the decline within six years by reducing the chances of cross breeding with domestic cats and lowering the risk to wildcats from feline diseases.
But Steve Piper, the founder and former chairman of the SWA, formerly a member of the SNH Wildcat Action Plan Group said the SNH's definition of what constitutes the animal is too relaxed. He added: "In short, anything that looks roughly two-thirds wildcat will be classified as a wildcat".
He said this means the scheme would lead to the protection of hybridised cats instead of protecting the few remaining animals in the wild that carry wildcat DNA exclusively.
Setting the threshold so low would mean that "the pure and near-pure wildcats that are still out there will be condemned to hybridise down to the lowest common denominator". He said the launch was the day it was forced into extinction.
He said: "This is a shameful effort from the Government after an entire year of consultation and a truly tragic day for the Scottish wildcat, which deserves so much better."
An SNH spokesman said: "We are disappointed that Steve has felt the need to raise this now when other partners are seeking to work together constructively.
"We have recently commissioned further research to establish current levels of hybridisation in key populations. If we find cats which are of good ancestry that is fantastic, but we need to be pragmatic."
l The great-crested newt and natterjack toad have been boosted in their survival fight by a £422,000 grant from the Heritage Lottery Fund for the Scottish Dragon Finder conservation project.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article