The question of whether the Queen would remain the head of state in an independent Scotland has been thrown into the spotlight once again after a Scottish minister said it would be "up to the people".
Aileen Campbell, minister for children and young people, has explained that her personal views differ from the stance taken by the Scottish Government.
"The Scottish Government's position is that after a yes vote next year the Queen would remain the head of state but like many people in Scotland I believe the sovereignty of people is a very important thing so it would be up to people to decide whether or not that would remain the case thereafter," she said on the BBC Three programme Free Speech.
Alex Salmond has previously stated that the result of the referendum next year will not change the role of the monarchy in Scotland.
Last month the chairman of the Yes Scotland advisory board, Dennis Canavan declared that the newest member of the Royal Family and third in line to the UK throne should never be king of Scotland.
It's a view shared by others in the pro-independence campaign including the Scottish Green and Scottish Socialist parties but conflict with those of the Scottish National Party and Scottish Government who wish to see the retention of the monarchy.
The First Minister has not said there would be a referendum on the Queen being retained as head of state, yet Ms Campbell has suggested otherwise.
Speaking on the TV show: "I think it's up to folk, folk like yourselves here in the audience who will have a say on how the country is shaped as we move forward and I think that's a really exciting thing.
"The birth of a child is always a happy event and I'm sure everyone wishes Prince George all the very best but for the country to move forward, a yes vote next year will allow us and enable us to take the decisions about what that country would look like, how it would feel and that includes about deciding who is the future head of state."
In response to Ms Campbell's comment, Scottish Conservative deputy leader Jackson Carlaw said: "It is increasingly clear that many leading SNP MSPs and MPs are doing nothing other than paying lip-service to the First Minister's assertions that the Queen would remain the head of state of an independent Scotland.
"They clearly want a referendum and a republic and the only thing stopping them from saying so is the knowledge that the Scottish people are comfortable with and support the monarchy and that by being honest about their intentions support for independence would slump even further.
"Scotland is facing its biggest decision for 300 years and the public deserve absolute clarity on what a separate Scotland would look like rather than the First Minister and his party contradicting each other over such a crucial issue."
Ms Campbell said: "As usual, the Tories are making mischief. All I was pointing out is that different parties can propose different policies in each election after independence, and that - just like in the UK - our constitutional monarchy rests on the consent of the people.
"The Scottish Government and SNP position, which I support, is clear - an independent Scotland will retain the Queen as head of state. The Queen is already monarch of 16 independent states in the Commonwealth, and a Yes vote next year will mean an independent Scotland will take its place as the seventeenth."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article