A SCOTTISH defence contractor has been accused of contempt of court after admitting it faked evidence in a legal row over the Royal Navy's new Type-45 destroyers.
Multimillion-pound marine engineering firm Ticon Insulation will go to Scotland's highest court today for a hearing in a rare civil action that, if successful, could result in its managing director being jailed for up to two years.
The company, highlighted by the anti-independence Better Together campaign as a big winner from lucrative UK Ministry of Defence contracts, denies contempt of court but acknowledges fabricating a vital court document.
The admission comes after a bitter legal dispute with former business partners Deck-Rite, which worked with Ticon on a £3 million contract on the Type-45 vessels when they were being built on the Clyde.
It thrusts Ticon, based in Stepps, North Lanarkshire, and its managing director, Tom Stark, into the centre of the highest-profile case of its kind since former No 10 spin doctor and ex-News of the World editor Andy Coulson was charged with lying during the Tommy Sheridan trial.
Ticon and Mr Stark are both cited in a minute of contempt lodged by Deck-Rite's lawyers at the Court of Session in Edinburgh to be heard today by Lord Woolman.
Deck-Rite hopes the judge will now order a rare civil proof of contempt, most likely to take place in the autumn.
Its contempt of court action, which has been cleared by the Lord Advocate, is civil. But any punishments for Ticon or Mr Stark would be criminal.
Deck-Rite, which is based in Bishopbriggs, East Dunbartonshire, is already suing Ticon in a dispute over £750,000 it believes it is due for work it carried out insulating the decks of the six hi-tech Type-45s.
Ticon disputes that it owes the money. As part of its defence, it claimed the contract with Deck-Rite came after it invited two other companies to tender.
The company produced a tender letter from one of those firms. However, Ticon has since admitted this letter, crucial to the commercial dispute and supposedly nearly a decade old, was fake.
In a minute lodged by lawyers for Deck-Rite, Ticon and Mr Stark are accused of "a premeditated and sophisticated scheme to procure and present a fabricated document with the intention of deceiving the court and thereby interfering with the proper administration of justice and subverting a fair trial".
The document added: "It is criminal at common law. The false evidence given by Mr Stark on oath at the open commission amounts separately to an offence."
In formal documents lodged with the court, lawyers on behalf of Ticon said: "The purported tender dated April 14, 2004, was a fabrication."
But they claimed the fake was the result of a "gross misconception" on the part of Mr Stark, who said he
was merely trying to recreate a document he insists once existed.
The lawyers said: "Mr Stark's conduct did not involve wilful defiance of, or disrespect towards, the court."
It is rare for contempt of court allegations to arise during civil or commercial cases in Scotland. But such allegations are taken seriously.
Contempt of court at the Court of Session, if proved or admitted, would be punishable by a up to two years in jail, a fine or both.
Ticon is nominally Scottish but a fully owned subsidiary of Norwegian multinational Wilh Wilhelmsen.
It is working on a £57m deal to insulate the two new aircraft carriers being partly built on the Clyde.
The contract was earlier this year cited by Dunfermline and West Fife Labour MP Thomas Docherty as evidence for the "Union dividend" secured by Clydeside defence contractors from Navy projects such as the carriers.
No-one was available for comment at Ticon yesterday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article