Donald Trump's controversial Scottish golf course has been criticised in a new report by the RSPB for damaging the environment.
The wildlife charity's State of the Nature report, launched by naturalist and TV presenter Sir David Attenborough, singled out Trump International Golf Links at the Menie Estae, Aberdeenshire, for harming nature in the area.
The development has been criticised for its impact on the Foveran Links, a local Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).
Aedán Smith, head of planning and development at the RSPB, said the area was one of very few specialist environments north of the Border for scientific research.
The report, written by 25 wildlife organisations found 60% of species studied, declined over recent decades and one in 10 species is under threat of disappearing from our shores.
It said: "Sand dunes and shingle areas have little value for agriculture, but are prime sites for tourist developments.
"Such developments often result in the loss of rare invertebrates, lichens and the rich orchid populations of wet sun slacks.
"What wildlife does survive is often left marooned on dune islands in a sea of development. Building work also interferes with the dynamics of dune systems."
The Trump International course near Balmedie was singled out in the report, because part of it was built on the Foveran Links SSSI.
The report said: "In recent years, damaging developments have been given the green light at Sovereign Harbour in East Sussex, Foveran Links SSSI Aberdeenshire and Carlyon Bay in Cornwall."
Trump's executive vice-president, George Sorial, said: "To date we are the only ones that have studied, preserved and actively managed that site, threatened by years of shooting birds, erosion and ongoing urban pressure.
"The dunes have now been preserved for generations to enjoy with 95% of the SSSI untouched.
"The RSPB should spend some time studying the facts and should actually visit the site before publishing such nonsense and fiction."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article