SCOTTISH campaigners are calling for internet service providers to filter pornographic content amid fears that police are not clamping down on so-called "rape porn".
Organisations and individuals working to eliminate violence against women say not enough is being done to tackle extreme pornography, which became illegal under Scots law in 2011.
They say internet filters should be put in place to stop people from having access to porn sites unless they choose to "opt in".
Plans were announced a decade ago to tighten laws around sites depicting rape, strangulation, torture and necrophilia, after the murder of 31-year-old Jane Longhurst, a teacher from Brighton.
After her death in March 2003 it emerged her killer, Graham Coutts, had been obsessed with websites such as Club Dead and Rape Action, which contained images of women being abused and violated.
Legislation came into force in Scotland two years ago which made it illegal to be in possession of extreme pornographic images, including those depicting rape.
Pressure groups south of the Border, including Rape Crisis, are currently lobbying Westminster to follow in Scotland's footsteps. But some women's groups in Scotland say the current laws don't go far enough.
The calls to make control of pornography even tighter in Scotland came after new figures revealed sex crime rose 5% in the past year.
The statistics, released by the Scottish Government last week, showed almost all other categories of reported crime had fallen except for sexual offences, which saw the number of rapes increase by 16%.
Highlands and Islands MSP Rhoda Grant, who is pursuing a bill on the criminalisation of the purchase of sex, said pornography, as well as other areas of the sex industry, was linked to "abuse and violence against women".
She said: "Porn gives young people a warped view of women which can lead to a skewed idea of relationships later in life.
"We have to ask if more should be done to make the viewing or downloading of porn from the internet more difficult. I think there should be filters in place to help that process.
Grant questioned why there was no "watershed" online stopping young people from viewing whatever they want.
She said: "If there's a watershed on the TV then why isn't there one for the internet?''
Psychologist Dr Mairead Tagg, of Glasgow East Women's Aid, called for extra funding to be given to organisations, including the police, to do more to charge people found in possession of extreme porn.
She said: "If there were better controls and filters it would help. We know there's a clear link between terrible abuse of women and porn."
Rape Crisis Scotland co-ordinator Sandy Brindley said: "We are concerned about the impact that images or films depicting rape porn has on young people, but the concern goes even beyond rape porn. Research shows the age young people start to access porn is 11."
However, Glasgow-based part-time escort and mum-of-one Laura Lee believes those views are outdated.
"I strongly object to the use of the term 'violence against women' when it comes to any element of the sex industry," she said. "It undermines the seriousness of real violence women have gone through, such as domestic violence.
"I'm a 5ft 9in dominatrix and I pulverise men, tell me what's degrading to women about that.
"Women pursue sex and porn as much as men do. This is 2013, not 1813.''
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said the Government was working "closely" with the UK-wide Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) to get to the root of the problem and "ensure the online safety of Scotland's children".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article