Rural Affairs Secretary Richard Lochhead will politicise a flagship countryside event if he discusses the impact of independence on rural Scotland there, the Liberal Democrats have claimed.
Mr Lochhead plans to speak out on the effect leaving the UK could have when he makes a speech at the Royal Highland Show, which is taking place at Ingliston, just outside Edinburgh, later this month.
But Lib Dems rural affairs spokesman Tavish Scott accused Mr Lochhead of "politicising" the show.
Mr Scott said: "The SNP's decision to politicise this year's Highland Show is regrettable.
"Taxpayers' money is being used to give a nationalist a political platform to rubbish the UK.
"The Highland Show should be a platform for Scotland's livestock and food - not for constitutional politics."
Mr Lochhead said the event was a fitting venue for outlining what independence could mean for rural communities.
He said: "As Rural Affairs Secretary I have worked hard to use the powers of devolution to drive forward our ambitions for rural Scotland, for its communities and its industries.
"But we will be able to do much more with the powers which independence brings.
"I firmly believe that Scotland's true potential has yet to be realised and that's particularly true in rural Scotland, where we have fantastic assets and yet, too often, find ourselves unable to harness their full potential because of the limitations of devolution.
"The Royal Highland Show is a major highlight of the rural calendar and I believe it's a fitting venue for us to outline our vision for what independence could mean for rural Scotland."
A spokesman for the pro-independence group Yes Scotland said: "Clearly, Tavish Scott hasn't yet heard that the No campaign is launching Rural Better Together, whose chairman is none other than his Liberal Democrat colleague George Lyon MEP, at the Royal Highland Show next Friday. Alistair Darling MP, that other well-known non-politician, will be officiating.
"To say this drives a combine harvester through Mr Scott's plea for the event to be politics-free is something of an understatement."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article