TWO more leading Scottish entrepreneurs have criticised a lack of proper debate by the country's political leaders before the independence referendum.
Engineering tycoon Jim McColl has accused the pro-Union camp of "scaremongering" and the Yes Scotland group of failing to respond with thorough analysis.
Sir Tom Farmer, the Kwik Fit founder and past financial supporter of the SNP, also said there had been a lack of facts and figures put forward by the opposing factions.
Mr McColl, who emphasised he had no political axe to grind, warned proper analysis of the key issues would have to come from both sides because the people of Scotland "aren't stupid".
His criticism follows comments from fellow entrepreneur Sir Tom Hunter about both sides failing to provide answers to the key questions.
Mr McColl, one of Scotland's richest men, said: "I don't think there is really a debate going on just now. I think what is happening is there are just statements and, in some cases, very misleading statements, statements that are more like scaremongering, rather than a proper debate.
"I am just assuming that this will flush through and, at some point, we will get debating what the real issues are."
Asked if this remark about scaremongering was aimed more at one side than the other in the independence debate, Mr McColl replied: "There seems to be a rush recently of just scary stories put out by the Better Together campaign."
Mr McColl, who runs the Clyde Blowers engineering empire, added: "I don't know if they are both holding fire because, if you let your argument be known too soon, someone will come out and find a way to oppose it. I don't think we have got on to the proper honest and open answers, rather than just saying here is another scary story."
Asked if he was disappointed about this situation, Mr McColl replied: "Yes, I am. I thought it would be much more honest and, I suppose, authentic discussion, rather than the scaremongering."
He cited currency and pensions as areas where Better Together had failed to deliver facts. He added Yes Scotland had merely responded to questions raised by the pro-Union campaign with "kind of just bullet-point statements."
Mr McColl said: "I am sure, from both sides, the analysis has got to come. The Scottish public aren't stupid. They are going to get to a point where they want more answers, they want more clarity."
The businessman stressed he had no political affiliation, despite often being labelled as being pro-independence or pro-SNP.
"My stance is still [that] I have got no political axe to grind."
Mr McColl added: "The 'vote No and then we will tell you what we are doing' won't wash."
A spokesman for Yes Scotland said the entrepreneurs were right to demand straight answers to straight questions.
He added: "Yes Scotland already has a wealth of information that answers many questions people have about independence. But we also recognise there is still a lot of hard work to do over the coming months to provide more answers to other important questions."
A spokesman for Better Together said: "The SNP campaign is putting forward a proposition that is high on assertion and low on facts. We will be challenging them every day between now and the referendum. We will be talking about the many benefits Scotland receives as part of the United Kingdom."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article