Scots are overwhelmingly in favour of keeping the pound in the event of independence, with Labour voters the most keen to remain in a sterling zone, research has found.
According to a YouGov poll commissioned by the SNP, Scots prefer by 66% to 19% the idea of retaining the pound as the currency of an independent Scotland. Of those asked, 15% were undecided about which currency they would like to use in the event of a Yes vote next year.
The poll of just over 1000 voters, carried out over the first three days of the month, asked the question: "Do you think an independent Scotland should or should not keep the pound?"
The results were replicated across supporters of all political parties, with Labour voters most in favour of keeping the pound.
Among Labour voters the figures were 71% in favour, 19% against, with 10% undecided.
Among SNP voters polled, the equivalent figures were 69% in favour, 18% against and 13% saying they did not know.
Among Tory voters the figures were 62% for, 27% against, and 11% undecided; for LibDem voters the figures were 64% in favour, 28% against and 8% undecided.
An SNP spokesman said: "The pound is Scotland's currency every bit as much as the rest of the UK's, and Westminster's threats have clearly backfired.
"An overwhelming majority of people in Scotland– including Labour, Tory and Lib Dem voters – believe that an independent Scotland should keep the pound."
He added: "That means Scotland having control of all our revenues and taxation policy, so that economic policy is decided by the Scottish Parliament and Government, not by George Osborne. Even the chairman of the No campaign, Alistair Darling, said that a currency union after independence was desirable and logical."
A spokesman for the pro-Union Better Together campaign mocked the poll as "desperate" and said: "We are glad that the SNP campaign has finally seen sense and now agrees with us. The only way to keep the pound is to stay in the United Kingdom."
The poll also demonstrated scepticism among Scots voters about the prospects for enhanced devolution powers in the event of a No vote.
The same poll also found that a majority of those asked thought that the No campaign should hand back the controversial donation from oil trader boss Ian Taylor.
It found that 43% of respondents thought the Vitol boss's £500,000 donation should be handed back, compared to 34% who did not agree and 23% who were undecided.
On the issue of pre-negotiations between Westminster and Holyrood so that Scots had a clearer picture of what they would be voting for in the referendum, Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said: "Westminster's refusal to enter into pre-referendum discussions so that they can help inform the debate is out of touch with the people."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article