MOST of the 600 interpreters British forces have used in Afghanistan should, where possible, stay in the country to help rebuild it, David Cameron has insisted.
Only "in extremis", where individuals were under direct threat of reprisals if they remained, should they be allowed to come to the UK, the Prime Minister said yesterday.
He made clear he had told officials to draw up a "really generous" financial package to help persuade the interpreters to stay in their own country.
However, Mr Cameron's stance is not likely to find favour with his deputy Nick Clegg who made clear he had "a lot of sympathy" with calls for the interpreters to be allowed to settle in the UK, saying it would be morally indefensible for Britain to "turn our backs".
The PM said: "I don't think we should turn our backs. There are two things we should do.
"One is to make sure that in extremis, of course, people can apply to come and live in the UK and we should have a fair system for doing that.
"But I do think that when we think of all that we have spent and all the cost in money and human lives we have put into Afghanistan, we should do everything we can to encourage talented Afghans to stay in their country and contribute to it."
Lord Ashdown, the former Liberal Democrat leader, who was once considered for the role of international envoy in Afghanistan, said the interpreters should be given the choice to stay or leave.
Agreeing with Mr Cameron that Britain had paid a heavy price in Afghanistan, the peer said: "We should not add to that price an act of dishonour on our leaving."
He added: "The truth is these interpreters put their lives at the service of our nation alongside our troops and we should honour that commitment."
It is thought at least 20 interpreters serving with UK forces have been killed since 2001 with many more wounded.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article