Congenitally blind people have more accurate memories than those with sight, research has found.
Experts at the University of Bath discovered that individuals with no visual experience had the most superior verbal and memory skills.
A team from the university's Department of Psychology ran memory tests on groups of congenitally blind people, those with late onset blindness and sighted people.
Each participant listened to a series of word lists and was then asked to recall what they had heard.
Research has previously shown people can falsely remember words related to those said.
For example, hearing "chimney", "cigar" and "fire" could trigger a false recollection of the word "smoke".
The University of Bath team, in collaboration with a research assistant from Queen Mary University of London, found congenitally blind people remember more words and are less likely to create false memories.
Sighted and late blind participants remembered fewer words that were said, and more that were not.
Dr Achille Pasqualotto, postdoctoral researcher and first author of the study, said: "We found that congenitally blind participants reported significantly more correct words than both late onset blind and sighted people.
"Most of the congenitally blind participants avoided unrelated words, therefore congenitally blind participants can store more items and with a higher fidelity."
Congenital blindness improves semantic and episodic memory is published today in the journal Behavioural Brain Research.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article