THE Ministry of Defence has been stopped from test-firing shells made of depleted uranium in Scotland by public opposition.
Defence ministers have assured MPs a planned weapon-testing programme will use alternatives to depleted uranium (DU).
The toxic radioactive metal, used to harden armour-piercing tank shells, has been blamed for cancers and birth defects suffered by soldiers and civilians after the Iraq war.
The MoD had been expected to re-start test-firing DU shells at the Dundrennan military range near Kirkcudbright later this year.
Over 30 years, army tanks have fired 6700 shells into the Solway Firth from the range, containing nearly 30 tonnes of DU. Some shells were misfired and contaminated the range. High levels of DU were found in earthworms on the site.
Armed forces minister Andrew Robathan has now said the shells "can be tested by firing variants that do not contain DU". Defence minister Philip Dunne has told the House of Commons testing "does not involve the firing of depleted uranium."
Rachel Thompson from the Campaign Against Depleted Uranium hailed the MoD's shift as a "major victory," adding: "This U-turn is linked to increased parliamentary and public opposition to an environmentally dubious and potentially illegal practice."
The MoD insisted the programme never required the firing of DU. "This is entirely unconnected to campaigns against test-firing," said a spokesman.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article