ANTI-SMOKING groups in Scotland have spoken of an urgent need to regulate the use of e-cigarettes to avoid creating a new wave of addiction.
The Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Authority (MHRA) is due to publish guidance next month which could effectively ban their use across the UK.
It is considering the re-classification of e-cigarettes as medicines, which would effectively take them off the shelves until they have had many years of clinical trials and testing, similar to pharmaceutical products. The EU has already issued a similar directive.
The chief executive of Ash Scotland, Sheila Duffy, said the charity does not support a ban on e-cigarettes as they could potentially help smokers move to a "less risky" product.
However she expressed concern that companies driven by profit were creating a "market for another addictive product".
Each year 13,500 people die from smoking-related illnesses in Scotland, which amounts to one in five of all deaths in Scotland.
Ms Duffy said: "Quitting tobacco is the single best thing a smoker can do to improve their health. We do not support banning e-cigarettes as they could help many smokers to move to a less risky product. However e-cigarettes are produced by commercial companies, with a profit motive."
According to Ash the number of people using e-cigarettes has more than doubled from 3% in 2010 to 7% in 2012. However they are not endorsed by MHRA or National Institute for Clinical Excellence (Nice).
Some experts believe that regulators have not acknowledged the lower risk profile of e-cigarettes because of concern that a reduced harm message might deter people from trying NRT (nicotine replacement therapy).
Clive Bates, a former director of Ash, has said previously that e-cigarettes have a vital role to play in "tobacco harm reduction".
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "We will await findings of the current MHRA and Nice guidance before considering what further advice on the use of products, such as e-cigarettes, is required."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article