ALISTAIR Darling is facing mounting pressure to order the return of a £500,000 donation to the Better Together campaign from the head of the world's largest oil trading company.
The Labour former Chancellor and leader of the anti-independence campaign defended the contentious gift from Ian Taylor, the head of Vitol, and denounced "personal attacks" on Mr Taylor by the pro-independence lobby.
But in addition to mounting pressure from the SNP, Labour's own former first minister Henry McLeish raised questions about the wisdom of receiving the businessman's gift, and called for "absolute transparency".
He said: "We have to be very careful about what kind of money should be used. The Unionist campaign has got to respond to legitimate questions and the criticism that's been put forward."
Labour backbench MP John Mann has called on the Tories to return donations given to the party by Mr Taylor.
Angus Robertson, the SNP's Westminster leader, said that demand should extend to the Better Together campaign.
"If Alistair Darling hangs on to this cash, the No campaign will be tarnished," he said.
Mr Taylor and his donation to the pro-UK campaign hit the headlines in light of Vitol's controversial activities in Serbia, Iran, Iraq and Libya.
Yesterday, Steve Murdoch, a history professor at St Andrews University, branded the No campaign's acceptance of Mr Taylor's donation "shameful".
Mr Murdoch ran an agency that provided aid to Bosnia in the 1990s war there, and suggested the money should be given to orphans of victims of death squads in Croatia and Bosnia.
The Better Together campaign has rejected Nationalist calls to hand back its largest single donation to date, and accused the pro-independence forces of mounting a dirty tricks campaign, which they deny.
Mr Darling said: "Ian Taylor is a respected figure in Scotland and in the UK. He has made a big contribution to Scottish life, including a personal investment that has revived the Harris Tweed industry."
The former Chancellor said the businessman had made clear his reasons for supporting the cause of keeping Scotland in the UK.
He added: "We are pleased to have his support and we think people who care about Scotland should be able to speak out against the Nationalists without facing - personal attacks."
At the weekend, Blair Jenkins, leader of the Yes campaign, made reference to Mr Taylor without naming him, stressing anti-independence forces were "largely funded by a Tory donor in the south who is not even eligible to vote here".
Last night, Mr Robertson claimed Mr Darling's refusal to hand back Mr Taylor's donation and investigate the background to it was undermining the credibility of the No campaign.
"Henry McLeish is absolutely right when he calls for clarity about the type of finance that we want.
"This is a serious error of judgement by Alistair Darling. He has to take this opportunity to reverse his position, do the right thing and hand the money back pending a full investigation by the No campaign."
Vitol has made it clear, in response to reports that in 2001 it paid $1 million to a Serbian warlord to secure an oil deal with the regime of Slobodan Milosevic, that it did nothing illegal.
A company spokeswoman said it is confident its tax affairs are compliant with the law in all of the countries where it operates.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article