Saudi Arabia has executed seven men for armed robbery, despite an appeal for clemency by United Nations human rights experts.
The men were sentenced to death in 2009 for crimes committed in 2005 and 2006, when some were younger than 18.
The conservative Islamic kingdom, which applies a strict interpretation of sharia law, has faced criticism by Western countries for its frequent use of capital punishment and trials that human rights groups say do not meet international standards.
The men, from Asir Province in the south of Saudi Arabia, had been due to die last week but were granted a stay of execution while authorities reviewed their case.
They were convicted of theft, including armed robbery, the Interior Ministry said.
Amnesty International and the mens' families said the robberies included one at a jewellery store.
Relatives claimed the seven had been forced to confess to unsolved crimes in the district, in addition to the armed robbery they had carried out. Amnesty said the men later retracted the confessions, which they said had been obtained through torture, without giving details. Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest oil exporter, denies it uses torture.
Human rights activists said the seven men were executed by firing squad yesterday – not beheaded as is customary.
A statement from the UN experts said: "The charges against all seven persons were allegedly fabricated and all seven were convicted following unfair trials."
The Saudi Interior Ministry named the seven men as Sarhan al Mushaikh, Saeed al Amri, Ali al Shehri, Nasser al Qahtani, Saeed al Shahrani, Abdulaziz al Amri and Ali al Qahtani and said they were part of a gang responsible for crimes including armed robbery and theft.
A ministry spokesman said: "By the grace of God, the security authorities were able to apprehend the perpetrators."
He described the sentence to death as "a punishment to deter others".
A group of relatives and friends of the men went to the royal court last week to seek a retrial or pardon from the king, arguing they had been denied proper access to legal representation and their crimes did not warrant execution.
The men were granted a stay of execution but were shot in Abha, the capital of Asir, one of the least developed parts of the country.
A prominent Saudi lawyer and supporter of efforts spearheaded by King Abdullah to reform the judiciary by standardising sentencing and retraining sharia judges, defended the executions.
"We are in a society where we used to leave our shops open and go to pray ... because we were sure nobody would come and steal our stuff. So to have an organised criminal group come and do such a thing, we don't like it," he said.
The lawyer said death sentences were reviewed by an appeal court, the high court and the king's office before the sentence was implemented.
"They don't just do the paperwork. No, they review the judgment," he said.
In January, King Abdullah said he had full confidence in Saudia Arabia's justice system after the UN voiced concern over the trial of a Sri Lankan woman who had been executed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article