It is "nauseating" that rich political donors like Sir Sean Connery should be allowed to support the Scottish National Party's (SNP) campaign for independence, a Labour MP claimed today.
Jim Sheridan (Paisley and Renfrewshire North) said only those who lived within Scotland and paid their taxes should be allowed to donate towards the campaign for independence ahead of the referendum next year.
He named James Bond actor Sir Sean, one of the most high-profile supporters of independence, during a heated debate in the Commons as MPs argued over the implications of a possible split with the rest of the United Kingdom.
It is expected MPs will later hand Holyrood the legal powers to go ahead with a referendum.
In a question to Labour colleague Ian Davidson, Mr Sheridan said: "Do you agree with me that it is one of the nauseating things that some of the people who are donating money to the SNP from abroad are actually living abroad to avoid paying tax?
"They want to tell us in Scotland how to live when we pay our taxes here and they are not paying their taxes where they are living, including Sean Connery."
Mr Davidson, chairman of the Commons Scottish Affairs Select Committee, said he believed the SNP did not have "any scruples" when it came to accepting money from donors who lived abroad.
He said: "There is a major question of principle here to be addressed as to whether or not the referendum can be bought and sold with foreign gold.
"Even at this late day, I would hope that the Scottish Parliament and the SNP would show confidence in their own ability to raise money from Scots in Scotland and desist from taking foreign money."
In a later jibe at the SNP, he joked: "There is a suggestion that 'Tax Dodgers for Separation' is about to set up in Monaco."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article