SUPPORT for independence has stalled as the SNP and Yes campaign enter a critical year for the debate on Scotland's future.
A new poll puts public backing for a split at 28% – unchanged from last October. It means the pro-UK campaign has a 20-point lead, more than double the nine-point advantage it enjoyed this time last year.
However, the Yes camp will take comfort from a recent fall in opposition to independence, which is down from an all-time high of 53% in October to 48%. Over the same period the number of don't-knows has risen from 19% to 24%, the highest level since the TNS BRMB series of polls began in 2007.
The softening of opposition follows the signing of the Edinburgh Agreement – due to be rubber-stamped by MPs later this week – which will hand Holyrood legal powers to stage the 2014 referendum.
For the first time in a major poll, the views of 16 and 17-year-olds were included. But they appeared not to alter the overall picture despite hopes in the Yes camp they would edge opinion towards independence.
The findings came as First Minister Alex Salmond pledged to outline what he called the "why" of independence in the coming year after months of wrangling over technical issues. But the latest poll shows how much ground he and the Yes campaign have to make up.
Since October new monthly polls, published together for the first time today, have shown little movement.
Support for independence dipped to 27% in November – an all-time low in the TNS BRMB series – and stood at 28% in December and this month. Opposition slipped from 50% in November to 48% in December, where it has remained.
The polls have coincided with a difficult period for the Scottish Government, which has faced criticism over its claims about an independent Scotland's EU membership and its plans to enter a currency union with the UK, and suggests support for independence is at or near a bedrock level. UK Government warnings about defence jobs were also in the headlines as this month's poll of more than 1000 voters in 55 constituencies was taken.
Chris Eynon, head of TNS BMRB Scotland, said: "The main effect of the Edinburgh Agreement between Cameron and Salmond in October was an increase in the undecideds and a slight decline in opposition to independence from its peak of 53%, rather than any more positive influence on opinion.
"Similarly, the recent debate around automatic EU membership or not following independence has had no adverse effect on levels of support, which might suggest these current levels of opposition and support are based much more on principle than the detail. They are a reflection of the heart rather than the head at this stage."
He added: "While this gives the Yes campaign a sizeable base on which to build and a significant 24% undecideds to attempt to win over, the gap of 20% remains large. If the opposition is consolidating at around 48%, the challenge is considerable.
"It is worth noting the introduction of those aged 16 to 17 to the sample has no effect on overall opinion, such is the low level of their representation within the electorate as a whole."
Mr Salmond yesterday said: "We will
explain how, by extending and completing the powers of the Scottish Parliament, we can deliver a fairer society for all the people of Scotland."
He said Westminster's backing for tough welfare cuts would prove a "key moment" in the independence debate, insisting an independent Scotland could "do better".
His comments were seized on by Scottish Labour's constitution spokeswoman Patricia Ferguson, who said: "It is an astonishing admission of failure from Alex Salmond that after 80 years of the SNP, the best part of 20 years as leader and more than five years as First Minister, he is only now getting round to explaining why Scotland should be independent."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article