HUNDREDS of thousands of people are suffering in silence from chronic pain, campaigners have warned MSPs.
Holyrood's Public Petitions Committee has been told that services to help patients with the problem were inadequate and lacked funding.
The committee was considering a petition submitted by Susan Archibald, who has suffered from chronic pain for 13 years.
Ms Archibald's petition calls for radical improvements to the current system, including the establishment of a residential unit in Scotland, the transfer of more management of chronic pain into primary care, a greater focus on a social rather than medical model of care, and a full debate in Parliament.
Ms Archibald told the committee: "There are so many people across the country that suffer from chronic pain.
"It is something that you can't see. It is the most debilitating thing that can happen to you."
She added: "There are so many folk across society that doctors and nurses haven't helped – not for the want of trying.
"They have never had access to specialist pain services, they have never had access to chronic pain management."
MSPs were told that a lack of residential services in Scotland and shortages in local day clinic services meant patients had to travel to Bath and Somerset for treatment.
Campaigner Dorothy-Grace Elder, a former Nationalist MSP, in giving evidence to the committee, said: "It is screamingly clear we should have an inpatient service [in Scotland]. Such a ridiculous situation cannot go on.
Ms Elder told the committee £1.1 million had been spent in the last three years sending 119 patients to the centre in Bath, with one patient making a 1600-mile round trip from Shetland.
She also said 10 out of 14 health boards do not fund dedicated chronic pain services.
"These services are in a double bind. No money from any of the health boards, so they have to beg and borrow from other departments, and no money from Government," she said. "It is preposterous."
The committee agreed to write to the Scottish Government, the British Medical Association and other relevant organisations.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article