A MILITARY instructor who was locked up under the Gaddafi regime for his alleged involvement in an airline disaster known as the "Libyan Lockerbie" has spoken out about it for the first time.
Majid Tayari was the instructor on board a Libyan MiG fighter jet reported to have been involved in a mid-air collision with Libyan Airlines flight 1103, killing 157 passengers, in December 1992. After 20 years of silence, he has now claimed he spent years behind bars for a crime he did not commit because the MiG did not collide with the passenger plane.
He said: "There is no air collision. We were too close to each other, yes. But there was no air collision."
Mr Tayari believes his jet was hit by wreckage from flight 1103. He added: "Right away we were hit from underneath with a very strong shock. I saw a huge fire and I decided to eject."
The air safety manager with Libyan Arab Airlines in 1992, Mahmud Tekalli, is also sure a mid-air collision was not the cause.
He believes flight 1103 was deliberately destroyed.
"The plane exploded in mid-air due to explosive devices, possibly put by Gaddafi agents," he said.
Relatives of the victims of the disaster also believe the MiG collision was fabricated by Gaddafi to cover up his plans to blow up the passenger flight so he could accuse the US Navy of a revenge attack for Lockerbie. They believe a bomb on board failed to detonate and the Libyan leader had the plane shot down and covered up the evidence.
However, Dr Jim Swire, a Justice for Megrahi cam-paigner whose daughter was killed in the Lockerbie disaster, claimed there was no evidence indicating Libya was ever involved in the Scottish explosion.
He said: "I've no knowledge of what caused the Libyan airline crash, but what I do know is that it's now clear Megrahi had no link to the Lockerbie disaster and therefore there is no valid link between the country of Libya and the atrocity and it's about time the world realised this."
Dr Swire added: "This year is going to be the year when this case is finally seen for what it really is."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article