Labour has suggested it could back a Conservative cap on immigration from outside the UK.
The surprise move came as leader Ed Miliband called on the UK to work harder to integrate outsiders.
Mr Miliband also apologised for what he said was his party's failure to control immigration or deal with racial and ethnic segregation when it was in power. The son of immigrants himself, Mr Miliband called for more to be done to ensure newcomers to the UK intergrated properly into society.
His set out a series of proposals including stricter English language requirements for public sector jobs.
Funding also should be channelled into English teaching ahead of non-essential translation.
Parents should be forced to pledge their children will learn English as part of agreements with their local school, he also suggested.
Also, there would be a crackdown on landlords who squeeze immigrants into overcrowded homes.
Labour would also be stricter on the use of "tied housing", where accommodation comes along with a job, which the party warns can lock migrant workers into atrocious conditions.
But in a surprise move he also signalled he was prepared to look at the idea of a cap – a policy he has previously criticised.
"We will look at how the Government's immigration cap works in practice," he said.
"But I believe we can all cope with these pressures if we recognise them and understand how to respond."
During a speech in Tooting, south London, the Labour leader also apologised for underestimating voters' concerns.
Some communities had been unable to deal with the scale and pace of immigration when Labour was in charge, he admitted.
However, PM David Cameron accused Labour of leaving the immigration system in "complete meltdown".
Figures released last month showed net immigration in the UK had fallen by one-quarter in the past year, to 183,000 in the year to March, down from 242,000 the previous year, according to the Office for National Statistics.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article