ON the face of it, the plans to explore Scotland's vast untapped reserves of "unconventional" gas supplies could be a positive move.
With ever-increasing gas prices and decreasing resources under the North Sea, the move could benefit the country financially and provide a secure source of energy for decades to come. Scotland, rich in methane gas because of its coal reserves, seems ideally placed to take advantage of new technologies.
However, the risks must be fully considered. Research from other countries suggests chemicals used to extract unconventional gas may have long-term health effects.
Environmental watchdogs in Scotland have also warned that the controversial technique of "fracking" for gas could bring radioactive waste to the surface. Meanwhile, hundreds of local communities are already protesting about plans to extract methane from coalbeds under areas near Falkirk and Stirling, with concerns over the risk of gas explosions to nearby railways and houses.
Before we rush to embrace a new gas boom, it is vital the public is given information on the potential risks that opening up huge swathes of Scotland for underground gas drilling could bring. If these are not fully known, a full review should be carried out to ensure unconventional gas extraction is safe.
George Osborne says families "should not be left behind" when it comes to reducing gas prices. But the rush to embrace unconventional gas should not come at the expense of health or the environment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article