And so the pressure moves off the shoulders of Andrew Dixon, departing chief executive of Creative Scotland, and on to its board, led by Sir Sandy Crombie.
News of Mr Dixon's resignation was in the offing some time. The Herald learned last week he had been signed off sick and he was, we were told, contemplating his future.
He has now resigned and will be leaving at the end of January. The search for a new chief executive will begin, but the body which the new leader will lead will have to look and feel different to the one led by Mr Dixon.
That is the settled wish of the national artistic and creative community which Mr Dixon, in his departing quotes, feels he could not win over, despite his personal positivity and apparent view, for months, that difficulties were merely a problem of communication.
Mr Dixon, who has his own skills and qualities, at times this year seemed to convey the sense that once companies and artists understood what Creative Scotland were really doing, then peace would break out.
But the problem wasn't only communication: it was what Creative Scotland was doing.
This ranged from axing Flexible Funding, to the language it used, to its desire to get involved in curating and commissioning as its own hybrid mix of arts funder and creative industries investor, from not having individual funding streams for each genre of the arts to unfortunate incidents like the all-male judging panel of its awards, among a litany of other mis-steps.
Now, one cannot envisage, as one noted Scottish philosopher once sang, the board "ripping it all up" to start again.
But one can imagine the board looking seriously at the roles and make-up of the senior management team.
It could look at how specialist knowledge inside the body is used, how short-term funding can be sustainable in the long term, what exactly it can and cannot do with its Lottery money, how to best speak and communicate with artists, and, perhaps most importantly, how a fresh start can be delivered in reality. Because the body cannot just carry on as it is, minus just one key executive.
It is notable, in his parting words, that Mr Dixon regrets not being able to "gain the respect and support of some of the more established voices in Scottish culture".
That could mean many of the names which signed the fatal "100 artist" letter in early October. He was personally shocked by the letter when it appeared. He should not have been.
And maybe if he had properly grasped earlier the scale and intent of the many concerns of artists, companies and even the Culture Secretary, his resignation may not have been as inevitable as it seemed last night.
After all, the buck stopped with him, and up until yesterday, no one had taken responsibility for the calamitous year the arts funding body has had.
But, by November, his relations with key players in the arts world in Scotland were just too fractured.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article