CAMPAIGNING MSP Margo MacDonald has promised a far tougher fight in favour of an assisted dying Bill in this Parliamentary session, after assembling a worldwide panel in support of her plans.
An event at the Royal Society of Edinburgh brought together a panel as diverse as Dignitas founder Ludwig Minelli from Switzerland; Sir Graeme Catto, Emeritus Professor at Aberdeen; the widow of the late Tony Nicklinson; and Kirk minister the Rev Scott McKenna.
Strong contributions were made by representatives of the Right to Die movement across the world, with two former doctors from the Netherlands speaking of the need for GPs and hospital doctors to engage in the process.
Ms MacDonald's new Member's Bill proposes that a trained, "licensed facilitator", a so-called "friend at the end", would have to be present when someone is at the point of ending their own life.
Such a measure is primarily aimed at making sure any fatal medication is taken correctly. A facilitator could be a doctor, social worker or close friend but not a relative or anyone who stands to gain from the death.
Ms MacDonald said at the conference: "My last Bill took a nosedive because we were too close to an election and we were too nice, deciding not to get involved in the rough and tumble. This time will be different."
Rob Jonquiere of the World Federation of Right to Die Societies, representing 45 groups across the globe, said the issue had to be presented as one of human rights. "When you legalise this you will give Scots the opportunity to make choices," he said.
All argued that public opinion was moving in favour of individuals having rights when it comes to choices at the end of life.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article