THE concern over the files is not the first time the issue of secret employment blacklists has been raised in the UK.
Former Glasgow MP and anti-blacklist campaigner, Maria Fyfe, gave evidence to the House of Commons Scottish Affairs Committee this year about the Economic League, a right-wing vetting agency which accumulated files on thousands of people it considered subversive.
It was originally set up in 1919 at a time when British industrialists were afraid of Bolshevism breaking out in Britain, the inquiry was told.
Thousands of companies paid for information to vet employees, but the league came under scrutiny over allegations it was holding inaccurate records and was wound up in 1993.
Fyfe said the methods used by the league to identify names included combing letters to newspapers, especially the left-wing press.
She cited the case of a war veteran, whose name appeared on the blacklist after writing a letter to a newspaper praising a council for buying a painting of Nelson Mandela.
Other names included novelist William McIlvanney, who was listed as a Marxist – despite saying he has never been committed to any party – and several MPs, Fyfe said. The MPs blacklisted included Adam Ingram, Tom Clarke, Tommy McAvoy, Peter Hain and Maria Fyfe herself.
Fyfe said: "This was described by one victim as McCarthyism in Britain, but he said – and I agree with him – it's worse than that because at least McCarthy was open enough to stand up in front of an American grand committee and say what he thought and believed. All of this was done in secret.
"It is amazing for MPs to be blacklisted, but there were thousands whose job chances were wrecked through this and they never knew it had been done."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article