THE launch of a new marketing campaign for Scotland's capital is in turmoil after councillors rejected the slogan "Incredinburgh" as the favoured branding for the city.
Marketing Edinburgh, the council-funded firm in charge of the strategy, is re-thinking its approach amid claims the proposed slogan is "absolutely appalling" and "twee".
Other catchphrases, such as "Paintthetownredinburgh" and "Wellfedinburgh" – for the city's pub and club scene, and its restaurants – have also been floated but met with little enthusiasm.
The row means the city's long-awaited re-branding has been scaled back, with a more limited winter campaign being planned instead.
Edinburgh's business and political communities have long hankered after a catchy logo to help transform the city's image. The "Glasgow's Miles Better" campaign, launched in 1983, is considered the standard-bearer for a Scottish city. It helped soften Glasgow's hard-boiled image by focusing on its cultural treasures and won international awards.
The "I Love New York" campaign was another global success.
Marketing Edinburgh was set up last year with council money to promote Edinburgh as a destination. Its chief executive is Lucy Bird; city council chief executive Sue Bruce is a director.
The Sunday Herald understands Marketing Edinburgh has a six-figure sum at its disposal to produce a winning slogan and strategy for the capital. The Leith Agency, which counts the Scottish Government, Honda and Grolsch among its many clients, is the firm that Bird and her colleagues have been using.
At a presentation to senior councillors earlier this year, the arms-length body unveiled "Incredinburgh" as the preferred option.
Other sub-slogans in a similar vein have also been suggested. 'Romanceisnotdedinburgh' was one of those mooted, as was 'Grabyoursledinburgh' for winter sports.
The presentation was met with scepticism by the politicians, who asked for other ideas to be considered. A second meeting with councillors led instead to the same theme being re-heated, prompting deputy council leader Steve Cardownie to walk out.
The new strategy is now said to be in limbo, despite the fact that Marketing Edinburgh is planning to launch a campaign in two weeks. Rather than unveil a year-long advertising campaign, Marketing Edinburgh will instead launch a winter-only strategy.
A council source said: "The politicians did not think the proposed campaign lived up to expectations, and it caused a huge amount of friction. The council insisted the campaign should be for the winter only, with the other slogans being put out for market testing."
Although no final decision has been made about the slogans, the Leith Agency has left a couple of digital clues about the plan.
On July 2 this year, the Edinburgh agency registered the web domain name Incredinburgh.com. Ten days later, a Twitter post in the name of Leith Agency creative director Gerry Farrell described a capital landscape as "Incredinburgh".
Jenny Dawe, the former Liberal Democrat leader of the council, said: "I think these ideas are absolutely appalling. You don't need silly slogans to market Edinburgh. They don't sound worth using at all, and they make me shudder."
Cameron Rose, the Conservative group leader, said: "Some of the slogans are a bit twee, and when you first hear 'Incredinburgh', I'm afraid it just doesn't cut it. That said, some may grow on us."
Steve Burgess, convener of the council's Scottish Green group, said: "Our group has never been convinced about the amount spent on marketing, as Edinburgh as a city speaks for itself."
Marketing Edinburgh's Lucy Bird said: "Over the past few months, we've collaborated with many of our city partners to develop a dynamic and lively new campaign for Edinburgh. As you would expect, there's a huge amount of planning and discussion around a project like this and we're welcoming feedback."
A council spokesperson said: "As with all marketing campaigns, ideas evolve during the discussions between partner organisations. We - look forward to the launch of the new campaign this winter."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article