THE Scottish Government and one of its key agencies have been heavily criticised by the Information Commissioner and ordered to release details about the Aberdeen City Garden project, after a 10-month freedom of information case fought by the Sunday Herald.
The information concerns a programme of pilot projects set up by the Government last year using a US public-private funding model called tax increment financing (TIF). Having received 16 applications, the Government announced last September that it would be taking forward projects in Aberdeen, Oban, Falkirk and Methil.
It reached this decision after each project was ranked for economic viability by the Scottish Futures Trust (SFT). The Sunday Herald asked to see the rankings, amid speculation that the SFT had ranked the Aberdeen project below certain applications that were later rejected for political reasons.
When the SFT and Government both refused to release the information, the matter was considered under appeal by the Information Commissioner Rosemary Agnew who found both bodies were wrong to withhold the information.
The Government was also told it had failed to comply with its duty to give advice about the information it held, despite being asked to do so, and for being 23 days late with its appeal decision.
The Scottish Government and SFT have been given until October 22 to decide whether to release the information or appeal to the Court of Session.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article