Plans for a controversial salmon farm off one of the lesser-known Hebrides have split nearby communities amid claims the venture will damage tourism and make island life more dangerous.
The divide emerged after campaigners pledged to fight proposals by the Scottish Salmon Company to establish the site just off Gometra, less than three miles from world-famous tourist destination Fingal's Cave on Staffa and nine miles from Iona.
Only five adults, and their children during the summer holidays, live on the island. They are all opposed to the plan.
However, there are others on Mull and Ulva who would welcome the jobs on offer from this scheme, along with another planned by the same company at nearby Loch Scridain. Seven jobs would be created between the two sites, in an area where employment opportunities are precious.
But Gometra islanders say the scale of the development is inappropriate, claiming the cages would stretch to the equivalent of five Wembley stadium football pitches, and the whole site equivalent to 42 Wembleys.
Crucially, the islanders fear the fish farm would make travelling to and from the island by boat more dangerous, forcing them out from the shelter of the island's north coast into more exposed water in Loch Tuath.
Gometra is connected by a bridge to the neighbouring island of Ulva but neither have proper roads. It takes about 50 minutes by quad bike and about one-and-a-quarter hours in a 4x4 vehicle to drive across rough hill tracks to get to the ferry to Mull at the east end of Ulva. By boat it is just 20 minutes, but the cages would be situated on that route.
Residents are also convinced the fish farm would damage the marine environment and kill the green tourism that brings people to see dolphins, porpoises, seal, basking sharks and minke whales. It is fear they would be repelled by the anti-seal sonar equipment the farm would use.
Gometra and Ulva are part of the Loch na Keal National Scenic Area (NSA), one of 40 such areas protected due to their outstanding scenery. Scottish Natural Heritage has told Argyll and Bute Council, which is due to consider the application next month, it opposes the application.
Mull Community Council said of the two sites: "We are frankly aghast that something of this scale is even being considered."
Iona Community Council also objects, not least because it would present "a direct conflict of interest with wildlife/eco tourism, which Mull and Iona are increasingly famous for and is now the basis of the local economy."
Roc Sandford bought the island 20 years ago when it was deserted and had one habitable house. He said: "This proposal would devastate the experience of living on the island or of visiting the Staffa Archipelago. If there is one place in Scotland not to site a salmon farm, this is it."
But there have been expressions of support from businesses on Mull and local residents.
Ulva resident Rebecca Munro, who lives close to where the fish farm would be located, reportedly said she was backing the development. She said: "There are a lot of people in favour but who don't speak up."
Stewart McLelland, chief executive of The Scottish Salmon Company said: "We have been overwhelmed by the local support for our plans to expand our operations in Mull."
A spokeswoman said it consulted with the Northern Lighthouse Board, Mull Aquaculture and Fishermen's Association, West Highland Anchorage and Mooring Association and the Royal Yachting Association, and none had raised concerns about navigating around the site.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article