NAKED rambler Stephen Gough has been found in contempt of court as he appeared in the dock naked to face charges of walking nude near a children's play park just three days after he was released from jail for a previous sentence.
A sheriff pleaded with the former Royal Marine to put some clothes on and get a lawyer ahead of his trial later this month.
But defiant Gough said he felt he was "appropriately dressed" and refused to cover up.
Gough was arrested by Fife Constabulary officers on the edge of Townhill, outside Dunfermline last month after complaints by locals.
He appeared at Kirkcaldy Sheriff Court yesterday for a pre-trial hearing.
Gough was held in a side room beside the building's court room – specially set up for him as other pre-trial hearings took place elsewhere.
He entered the dock handcuffed to a G4S security officer wearing only a pair of hiking boots and white socks, and clutching court papers.
He was seated on a towel in the dock as he represented himself during the 10-minute hearing.
Sheriff Richard Macfarlane said: "You appear today unclothed – is there a reason?" Gough replied: "Freedom."
The sheriff said: "It is not appropriate in the setting which you find yourself in this morning – a court of law – and there are certain standards. Appearing naked does not meet that.
"It may be that coming in as you have could be a contempt of court. I ask you, Stephen Gough, are you prepared to dress appropriately?" Gough replied: "I think I am dressed appropriately."
Sheriff Macfarlane: "You're not dressed at all."
Gough: "I think that's appropriate."
The sheriff told Gough that, as he had refused to put clothes on, he would be found in contempt of court, meaning he may face even more jail time regardless of the outcome of his trial later this month.
It is alleged Gough conducted himself in a disorderly manner in the village's Cairncubie Road on Friday.
The charge against him alleges he walked naked in a public park close to a children's play park.
Prosecutors say he refused to put on clothing or move away from the area and committed a breach of the peace.
The incident is said to have taken place on July 20.
He had been released from his last sentence, imposed after he walked naked from Perth Prison at the end of another jail term, on July 17.
Gough, 53, who gave his address as Eastleigh, Hampshire, denies the charge. He asked the court for copies of witness statements against him to be disclosed by the prosecution.
He said: "I am prepared for trial."
Sheriff Macfarlane continued the case to trial on August 23 –and pleaded with Gough to reconsider getting dressed.
He said: "I ask that you reconsider your position with how you dress when you are brought to the court for trial.
"You could find yourself yet again, as today, in contempt.
"I renew my plea to you regarding representation as well – it is in matters of this kind where instructing a lawyer could so benefit you."
Gough was remanded in custody ahead of the trial. He has spent most of the last six years in solitary confinement at HMP Perth. He has repeatedly been arrested seconds after walking free from the jail in the city's Edinburgh Road.
Last August he was jailed for 657 days for breach of the peace and contempt of court.
The breach was for leaving HMP Perth naked at the end of a previous sentence, while he was found in contempt for representing himself at the city's sheriff court while naked, Gough became known as the naked rambler after he tried to walk naked from Land's End to John O'Groats in 2003 after quitting his job as a lorry driver.
He was repeatedly arrested and served four months in Inverness Prison, eventually reaching John O'Groats in 2004.
He set off again in 2005 and was repeatedly arrested once he crossed into Scotland – serving two prison services before arriving in 2006.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article