THE Coalition Government was yesterday criticised again for failing to consider the security implications for the UK of Scotland becoming independent.
In March, Westminster's Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy expressed unhappiness at the UK Government's lack of "horizon-scanning" in relation not only to the possibility of Scottish independence within the next three years but also to the prospect of a collapse of the eurozone.
Labour's Lord Foulkes, who sits on the committee, said at the time he was "astonished" by the lack of the Coalition's contingency planning, particularly as Scotland was home to Britain's nuclear deterrent.
The Government said the criticism was "not well-founded" as there was considerable discussion about Scottish issues at the highest level of Government and that the Coalition had expressed its commitment to keeping the UK together.
Yesterday, in response to the Government's comments, the committee repeated its rebuke, noting how the Coalition was focused on its opposition to Scottish independence, "reinforcing our belief that the possibility independence might actually happen is being neglected in strategic planning".
Sir Malcolm Bruce, another of the committee's members, said: "Given we have a date, a provisional date at least, for that referendum, the committee collectively was surprised."
The LibDem MP also highlighted the SNP's desire to remove as quickly as possible the Trident nuclear deterrent from Scottish waters as well as the future of military bases and how the newly-independent nation would co-operate on defence and counter-terrorism.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article