Seven of Scotland's leading playwrights have written to Creative Scotland to express "extreme concern" over its controversial funding changes, which they fear is a "catastrophic error of judgement".
The joint letter is from Peter Arnott, Ian Brown, David Greig, David Harrower, Zinnie Harris, Linda McLean and Douglas Maxwell – some of the most acclaimed writers in Scotland. It urges the body, which unveiled its funding revamp two weeks ago, to work with Scottish artists to create a new funding strategy "in which all have trust and that will more effectively contribute to the flourishing of Scotland's art and culture for the future".
The funding changes will see 49 major arts companies move from multi-year "flexible" funding to project funding from next year.
These companies, the writers say, are "the living heart of Scottish culture".
The letter, addressed to Sir Sandy Crombie, chairman of Creative Scotland, says: "We are extremely concerned that insecurity and misdirected management energies will arise from the system so far announced, rather than the proper administration of scarce resources.
"Project funding is a state of constant uncertainty.
"Under that system, artists and producers can't plan ahead. It is a kind of limbo which may, just, be a defensible testing ground for young companies, but it is utterly unsuited to the flourishing of established artists and mature organisations."
Andrew Dixon, chief executive of Creative Scotland, has said the changes are "not about cuts" and has noted the large increases in National Lottery funds that are now available to arts companies.
Earlier this week, Culture Secretary Fiona Hyslop reminded Scottish artists that more savage cuts had been felt by companies in England.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article