IMPROVING language learning in schools is becoming an economic necessity.
Recently, a petrochemical firm cited an inability to recruit language speakers as the reason its Scots headquarters did not become a European sales hub, causing a loss of jobs worth £4 million a year.
The problem will only get worse. Scotland's main markets are currently in the English speaking world, but Scottish Development International anticipates the rise of spending power in China, India, Brazil and Russia will change the face of Scots trade in the next decade.
The "cycle of decline" in Scotland is well-illustrated in the report.
It notes: "With fewer students taking languages to exam level ... this can impact on the viability of the language qualifications that the Scottish Qualifications Authority can offer and on higher education institutions maintaining their investment in language departments.
"This is resulting in fewer new teachers able to teach language skills and fewer linguists to satisfy the jobs market more generally."
It pins the blame on the previous Labour-led Scottish Government.
From 1989, an initiative called Languages for All had established compulsory language teaching up to S4, but this was swept away a decade later with a shift from compulsion to entitlement for secondary pupils.
"The shortcomings of that approach are now evident in the wide variation of current provision," the report says.
It is perhaps surprising to note none of the recommendations suggests the reintroduction of compulsion. The Scottish Government will rely on the focus on primary teaching generating greater interest in secondary.
There are two key concerns. Some argue greater focus should be given to improving existing continuity between primary and secondary language study before expansion.
The other uncertainty is whether there is funding for the recommendation for the Government to considerthe resource implications of its language policy, making dedicated appropriate additional funding available to councils.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article