Anglers are calling for measures to reel in salmon netters on Scotland's rivers, amid claims that the activity may hit fish numbers.
The body that represents angling interests on Scotland's salmon rivers wants a change in the law to give its members first refusal on any salmon netting rights that come on the market.
The Association of Salmon Fishery Boards (ASFB) says the need for this new provision is highlighted by the acquisition by a Scottish netting company of several dormant or lightly fished netting stations.
The ASFB claims mixed-stocks coastal netting stations indiscriminately catch any salmon passing by, regardless of where they are heading or the strength of the population in their home rivers. It argues such stations are non-selective, and make management of river stocks almost impossible.
The ASFB wants the right of pre-emption in favour of local district salmon fishery boards included in the coming Aquaculture and Fisheries Bill at Holyrood.
Dr Alan Wells, policy and planning director for ASFB, said: "Any increase in coastal salmon netting constitutes a significant threat to sound salmon management."
The family-run Usan Fisheries Ltd, near Montrose, is one of Scotland's few remaining salmon netters, and is behind two purchases the ASFB highlights in Caithness and Aberdeenshire.
Usan director George Pullar criticised what he called "the blatant attempt by the angling lobby to further persecute legitimate salmon-netting operators".
"We would suggest the ASFB rationale for seeking pre-emption rights has little to do with conservation and everything to do with increasing the capital value of their rod fisheries."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article