THE public inquiry into how hundreds of Scottish NHS patients contracted Hepatitis C and HIV from contaminated blood has already cost almost £9 million before the final report by Lord Penrose has even been completed.
The figure has prompted Holyrood's justice convener, Christine Grahame, to say a way must be found to streamline such inquiries to get the costs down.
"We should be looking at having a system that finds answers to the lessons that have to be learned but looks to keep costs down in this day and age," she said.
Ms Grahame suggested that one answer might involve replacing full-scale public inquiries with judicial inquiries with narrower remits. .
The inquiry into blood contamination affecting hundreds of patients in the 1970s and 1980s was called by Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon in April 2008, having been rejected by the previous administration.
It was chaired by senior judge Lord Penrose, supported by a senior QC, three junior counsel, a solicitor, deputy solicitor, a secretary on secondment from the Civil Service, a deputy secretary, a witness liaison manager, document and evidence manager and deputy manager, and a medical assessor.
The cost emerged in a parliamentary answer from SNP MSP Gil Paterson asking about the interim cost of the Penrose Inquiry. Ms Sturgeon replied: "The interim cost of the Inquiry from January 12, 2009 to March 31, 2012 is £8,788,901.
"A final figure for the total cost of the Penrose Inquiry will be published when the Inquiry has completed its work."
Scottish Conservative health spokesman Jackson Carlaw said: "This cost does raise questions about finding ways to get to the bottom of such issues in a more efficient, streamlined way."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article