THE chief constable of Scotland's largest police force will today make an unprecedented apology to former detective Shirley McKie for the pain she has suffered as a result of the now infamous fingerprint case.
Stephen House will apologise on behalf of his force, Strathclyde, for the "pain and suffering" it caused to Ms McKie and her father Iain after meeting them last week.
Ms McKie was wrongly accused of leaving her fingerprint at a murder scene, but fully exonerated by a public inquiry that concluded in December.
She was tried for perjury in 1998 after insisting a fingerprint found in the home of murder victim Marion Ross in 1997 did not belong to her.
Ms McKie was later cleared of lying under oath and, in February 2006, was given £750,000 by the then Scottish Executive in an out-of-court settlement.
Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill ordered the public inquiry, saying the controversy had "cast a shadow of uncertainty and suspicion" over the individuals involved and the criminal justice system.
Inquiry chairman Sir Anthony Campbell recommended that fingerprint evidence should be now "recognised as opinion evidence and not fact".
In his report, Sir Anthony said the fingerprint in question, known as mark Y7, had been "misidentified as the fingerprint of Ms McKie".
He put this down to "human error" and said there was "no conspiracy against Ms McKie".
Mr House, who joined the force almost a decade after Ms McKie was arrested, will tell the Strathclyde Police Board today that he hopes lessons will be learned.
His statement will say: "I am satisfied that the report did not find fault in the way in which officers of Strathclyde Police had conducted themselves throughout the course of events that led to the establishment
of the inquiry. However, I do want to inform members that I recently met with Shirley McKie and her father Iain.
"I thought that it was entirely right and proper that I apologised to them for the very lengthy and very public process that they had had to endure, and for the pain and suffering that they have experienced as a result.
"Both were officers in Strathclyde Police and it is my belief that Shirley, in maintaining the truth under such traumatic circumstances, adhered to the highest ideals of the police service; displaying honesty and integrity of a remarkably high manner.
"Both Shirley and Iain appreciated the fact that I had met with them and, like me, they hope that lessons can and will be learned as a result of these events, and that the Campbell Report will have a positive effect on forensics and fingerprint practices here in Scotland."
Iain McKie praised Mr House's integrity and said he and Shirley welcomed the apology.
"This is a fitting end to what has been a traumatic 14 years," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article