RAIL travellers could be paying 7% less for their fares if ScotRail had not paid out millions in dividends to shareholders, MSPs have been told.
The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT) said franchise holder ScotRail paid dividends of £18 million in 2010, £18m in 2009, £17m in 2008 and £21m in 2007.
In a submission to Holyrood's Infrastructure Committee, which is taking evidence on the future of the rail franchise from 2014, the RMT said: "In two of these years, ScotRail actually paid more in dividends than it made in profit, leading to the obvious conclusion that because it does not contribute anything towards investment in the railway or rail infrastructure, and with the level of Government subsidy even covering its track access charges, it is simply milking Scotland's railway."
The union said the Scottish Government's proposals in the Rail 2014 consultation allowed for "the intensification of this theft".
It added: "If dividends were not paid in 2010, RMT estimates rail fares could have been reduced by almost 7%, which would undoubtedly improve accessibility. This makes clear the case for public ownership of Scotland's railways."
An annual season ticket between Glasgow and Edinburgh, which covers peak travel times, currently costs £3380, so a reduction of 7% would save £236.
A ScotRail spokesman said no dividends had been paid in the early years of the franchise "to allow significant investments to be made".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article