THE Crown Office's handling of the prosecution of the man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing is to be raised in the Scottish Parliament.
And the Inspectorate of Prosecution in Scotland has been asked to initiate inquiries into allegations the Crown failed to disclose substantive evidence to Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi's defence team.
Both moves were instigated by Christine Grahame, an SNP MSP and member of the Justice for Megrahi campaign.
She warned: "While there is a suspicion the Crown Office has not behaved with propriety, this cannot be good for the Scottish justice system."
Ms Grahame, who is convener of Holyrood's Justice Committee, said the Scottish Government did not have the power to institute a far-reaching public inquiry – which would require evidence from former prime ministers, the FBI and others.
But it could, under the 2005 Inquiries Act, hold one into matters which were wholly devolved and the Crown Office would be subject to that.
As revealed in The Herald this week, there is material within the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) report into Megrahi's conviction for the atrocity, in which 270 people died, to suggest he may have suffered a miscarriage of justice on six different grounds.
Ms Grahame said yesterday: "The Scottish Government already has the power to inquire into the activities and the actions of the Crown Office -and the allegations that evidence that should have been disclosed was not disclosed."
She claimed an inquiry under the existing legislation on devolved powers or by the Inspectorate of Prosecution could go ahead because it appeared there were "no prohibitions" on the Scottish Government.
She added: "Let's find out if there is any merit in what is being put into the press and into biographies."
Tory justice spokesman David McLetchie said an appeal by Megrahi would "have the merit of allowing the case to be determined in a Scottish court of law". But he added if there was no such appeal then there had to be a judicial public inquiry.
Labour justice spokesman Lewis Macdonald said: "What The Herald's investigation has exposed is that a number of questions remain unanswered. However, it is our view these matters are best settled in Scotland's court of law – not a public inquiry."
Patrick Harvie, of the Scottish Green Party, said: "There have long been doubts about Mr Megrahi's conviction and the best way to establish the truth is to hold a public inquiry."
A Scottish Government spokesman said Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill had not seen the SCCRC report as "this would be inappropriate".
Mr MacAskill has written to UK Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke asking for an exemption under data protection laws to allow the SCCRC document to be made public. But a spokesman for Mr Clarke said last night that any decision on disclosure was for the SCCRC.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article